Divorce is a messy business. All parties face daunting legal, economic, and psychological difficulties. And much like a knife fight, there’s no way to go through one without getting cut but it looks increasingly like the labor equivalent of divorce is the option of choice in Minneapolis where the Minnesota Orchestra Association (MOA) leadership and musicians have all but determined that there’s little chance to move forward unless the other side leaves.
According to a 12/09/2013 Star-Tribune article by Graydon Royce, the musicians announced that they intend to begin giving regular performances and are even in the process of filing for their own 501(c)(3) organization with the mission of “inspir[ing] an ever-widening audience to seek a lifelong relationship with great symphonic music.”
Forming their own nonprofit organization poses some potential legal challenges and if the MOA decides to file an unfair labor charge, it will be fascinating to see how the Region 18 of the National Labor Relations Board rules.
Potential rulings notwithstanding, that doesn’t change the nature of the relationship and the 12/11/2013 edition of the Star-Tribune, once again from Graydon Royce, reports that 10 state legislators sent a three page letter addressed to the full MOA board calling for the resignation of CEO Michael Henson, Chairman Jon Campbell, Past Chair Richard Davis along with “any others in MOA leadership involved in the public deception and the financial mismanagement of the organization.” (full letter, h/t Star-Tribune).
Therefore, and to continue along the divorce analogy path, think of the situation like this:
- Spouse A no longer cares for the way Spouse B looks and in order to improve the situation, insists that Spouse B submits to a series of cosmetic and gastric bypass surgeries while simultaneously contributing more to the household’s bottom line. Oh, and Spouse B should stop complaining so much.
- Spouse B will have none of and gets kicked out of bed by Spouse A.
- After a prolonged separation, Spouse B makes public the intent to begin seeing other people along with keeping all of their former, mutual friends. But at the same time, they don’t want to file for divorce.
- A group of mutual friends begin telling anyone who will listen that Spouse A should grant a divorce and get out of town so Spouse B can find a new partner. They go so far as to write to Spouse A’s family suggesting that they should disown Spouse A for being such a dishonest cheapskate and abusive partner.
From this perspective it is easy to see why expecting both parties to compromise and get back into bed with one another to make beautiful music as an idyllic family is an increasingly unrealistic expectation.
Related Posts
-
One item we missed last week was an article about growing tensions in the Philadelphia Orchestra Association (POA) collective bargaining negotiations. Written by Peter…
-
We move one step closer to checking off all the groups on our list of mid to large budget orchestras with expired agreements that…
-
The Chicago Symphony Orchestra (CSO) becomes the latest group from our list of mid to large budget orchestras with expired agreements to reach a…
Has anyone raised the issue of the board’s fiduciary duty and whether that holds during a lockout, which is not the same as a strike? I’m coming into this a bit late so maybe it’s already been covered.
Its a little more complicated than that. The bankers entered Walhalla, after stealing the pile of gold. I suspect the gold is cursed and will bring ruin to anyone who tries to gain it. If it was not for the pot of gold everybody would move on. It is all foretold in the Ring.
Drew – I think a few more details on Spouse A are probably in order: Spouse A was probably hoping all along that Spouse B would pick up and leave, but didn’t want to lose the newly renovated house or the bank accounts in the settlement.
During the Board’s annual meeting yesterday, the same two banksters, Campbell and Davis were re-elected, thereby further dimming any hopes for a resolution to this sick marriage.
The term “double down” comes to mind.
Similarly, the screaming non-sequitur in the chairman’s statement yesterday that the $1M deficit incurred during a no-concert year somehow supports management’s position reinforces the impression that they have gone around the bend. I think it is quite fair to say that there are a lot of successful and sophisticated people in the community and around the country who are quite offended by the management’s lockout strategy. Not just because of the hardship for the musicians but also because as a strategy it was stupid to begin with. Their “double down” is further evidence of a remarkable tone-deafness and insularity.