As mentioned last month, the annual Orchestra Website Review is taking place a few weeks later than normal this year but the upside is it provides a bit more time to prepare, which is a good thing because a cursory review of many websites indicates that quite a few changes have taken place since last season. However, before the reviewing period begins in earnest, I wanted to solicit any suggestions as to how you think the reviews can improve.
Evaluation Criteria: should the existing criteria remain unchanged; if not, what changes do you suggest?
Presentation Format: should the existing format remain unchanged; if not, what changes do you suggest?
Publication Schedule: do you like the overall reviews first and details to follow or would you prefer the other way around?
Awards: do you have any suggestions for new award categories?
Of course, any other suggestions and observations are greatly appreciated so don’t be shy, send your ideas directly or post them as a comment.
Did you know that a routine boilerplate included in many grant agreements (especially those from government sources) stipulates the receiving organization agrees that their…
Rules and regulations surrounding internet use are anything but consistent. Take website policies for example. Does your organization have the exact same polices in…