As mentioned last month, the annual Orchestra Website Review is taking place a few weeks later than normal this year but the upside is it provides a bit more time to prepare, which is a good thing because a cursory review of many websites indicates that quite a few changes have taken place since last season. However, before the reviewing period begins in earnest, I wanted to solicit any suggestions as to how you think the reviews can improve.
- Evaluation Criteria: should the existing criteria remain unchanged; if not, what changes do you suggest?
- Presentation Format: should the existing format remain unchanged; if not, what changes do you suggest?
- Publication Schedule: do you like the overall reviews first and details to follow or would you prefer the other way around?
- Awards: do you have any suggestions for new award categories?