#NAMPC 2015 was a fantastic conference and you can expect a round up post coming soon via ArtsHacker as a joint article with my co-presenter and ArtsHacker contributor, Ceci Dadisman. As for today, I’m in the normal sort of catch-up mode after being away at the brain etch-a-sketch shake that is a conference; as such I want to point out two articles of note that deserve your attention.
(Purportedly) Sleazy In Seattle: Howard Sherman posted an article on 11/2/15 (h/t You’ve Cott Mail) that just goes to show that no matter how many people play by the rules, there always seems to be a bad apple around to spoil the bunch. Long story short, a critic in Seattle was apparently attempting to sell one of his two comp tickets received for the purpose of writing reviews to someone that would serve as a “companion.” Other outlets have picked up on the situation and go so far as to identify and name the critic in question.
One Step Closer To Acknowledging Overhead: Joe Patti published a follow-up article on 11/9/2015 about the issue he’s been covering vis-à-vis recent changes in Federal regulations that account for nonprofit overhead expenses. As Patti acknowledges, this may not seem like a terribly sexy topic but it is one of those things that holds a tremendous amount of influence on how government grants can be used and, hopefully, begin moving private foundations in the same direction.
It seems that culture organizations in Denver, CO and Charlotte, NC are leveraging the Super Bowl match between their respective teams for increased media…