For the past few years, one of the most popular items in the orchestra compensation reports is a big picture overview of all compensation alongside Total Expenditure figures. So if you’ve been looking for something that shows all of the report values in a single chart, this article is exactly what you’ve been looking for.
15 Year Trends
Although the Orchestra Compensation Reports have been around since 2005 (which covered the 2003/04 season) my 990 archive extends back through the 1999/00 season. Consequently, this overview article is an excellent vehicle for reaching back into those archives usually reserved for consulting work and extracting information to share.
To that end, I’m happy to say that this year’s installment will include a new dynamic charting tool that will make it easier to not only provide charts and graphs for changes in average compensation per stakeholder, but overlay them into a single chart. All of this makes it much easier to visualize the bigger picture.
Average Executive Compensation From 1999/00 Season Through 2013/14 Season
Sorry, this information is no longer available.
Average Music Director Compensation From 1999/00 Season Through 2013/14 Season
Sorry, this information is no longer available.
Average Concertmaster Compensation From 1999/00 Season Through 2013/14 Season
Sorry, this information is no longer available.
Combined Average Stakeholder Compensation From 1999/00 Season Through 2013/14 Season
Sorry, this information is no longer available.
The Deliberation Continues
When the compensation reports were launched back in 2005, there was a great deal of reader discussion about the value of each stakeholder group along with questions about why they didn’t share comparatively equal gains and losses from one season to the next. In the wake of the economic downturn, those discussions began to wane but a few key areas have once again sparked that core discussion.
For example, the supposedly shared sacrifice of Philadelphia Orchestra’s CEO during their bankruptcy was quickly followed by a complete restoration and a host of bonuses and perks (details). And this year’s revelation of a $3,321,541 signing bonus for Dallas Symphony Orchestra’s music director during the 2013/14 season when the musicians experienced a pay freeze from the 2012/13 season ($84,054 base musician annual salary), potentially introduces a long standing contentious dynamic to labor relations.
It will be fascinating to see whether or not there are any changes in how boards initially set and evaluate compensation for executive and music director stakeholders. Based on the patterns from the past few available seasons, there doesn’t appear to be much inclination to control those expenditures. For music directors in particular, the rate of increase in average compensation actually increased over the previous decade after a single year drop in the 2008/09 season.
The purpose of the Orchestra Compensation Reports is to help demonstrate the value of transparency and inspire patrons to become increasingly interested in how their respective orchestra functions.
To that end, it has been wonderful watching discussions across social media and other media outlets unfold. Yes, there’s always going to be an element of salaciousness but by and large, that quickly melts away into more meaningful discussions surrounding the systems used to determine whether the field is rewarding effort or achievement.
Related Posts
-
As is the case with every annual orchestra compensation report, the most important element to keep in mind is these figures encompass the 2013/14…
-
When it comes to executive compensation, the 2013/14 season was the first in a while where a number of the traditionally highest paying executive…
-
Since the economic downturn, concertmaster compensation has failed to keep pace with executive and music director stakeholders and for the 2013/14 season, they were…
2 thoughts on “2016 Orchestra Compensation Reports: The Big Picture”