In anticipation of the upcoming 2009 Orchestra Website Reviews, there is one particular new feature worth mentioning in advance. After years of hearing from readers about which features they find important in an orchestra website but never having a way for them to incorporate them into the reviews, I am very happy to announce that 2009 will be different. This year’s examination will give you the opportunity to rate each orchestra website included in the review yourself…
Final touches are still being put together but once completed, you will be able to go to a special page and rate each website using a similar 5-star rating system like the one used by Amazon.com. After several years of painstakingly combing through professional orchestra websites and rating them based on a clear set of quantifiable criteria, I’m looking forward to seeing what stakeholders feel.
In order to get your review groove on, here’s a list of all the US and Canadian orchestras included in the 2009 review linked to their respective websites so set aside a little time each day over the next week to visit each site. Everyone will be encouraged to rate websites based on whatever criteria they feel is important, but if you want to follow the criteria used in the official reviews, you can use the 2008 criteria as a very useful guide.
US ORCHESTRAS
- Alabama Symphony
- Atlanta Symphony
- Austin Symphony
- Baltimore Symphony
- Boston Symphony
- Buffalo Philharmonic
- California Symphony
- Charleston Symphony
- Charlotte Symphony
- Chattanooga Symphony
- Chicago Symphony
- Cincinnati Symphony
- Cleveland Orchestra
- Colorado Springs Philharmonic
- Colorado Symphony
- Columbus Symphony
- Dallas Symphony
- Dayton Philharmonic
- Delaware Symphony
- Detroit Symphony
- Elgin Symphony
- Florida Orchestra
- Fort Wayne Philharmonic
- Fort Worth Symphony
- Fresno Philharmonic
- Grand Rapids Symphony
- Harrisburg Symphony
- Hartford Symphony
- Honolulu Symphony
- Houston Symphony
- Huntsville Symphony
- Indianapolis Symphony
- Jacksonville Symphony
- Kalamazoo Symphony
- Kansas City Symphony
- Knoxville Symphony
- Las Vegas Philharmonic
- Long Beach Symphony
- Long Island Philharmonic
- Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra
- Los Angeles Philharmonic
- Louisville Orchestra
- Memphis Symphony
- Milwaukee Symphony
- Minnesota Orchestra
- Mississippi Symphony
- Naples Philharmonic
- Nashville Symphony
- National Symphony
- New Jersey Symphony
- New Mexico Symphony
- New York Philharmonic
- North Carolina Symphony
- Omaha Symphony
- Orchestra Iowa
- Orchestra of St. Luke’s
- Oregon Symphony
- Pacific Symphony
- Philadelphia Orchestra
- Phoenix Symphony
- Pittsburgh Symphony
- Rhode Island Philharmonic
- Richmond Symphony
- Rochester Philharmonic
- Saint Louis Symphony
- Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra
- San Antonio Symphony
- San Diego Symphony
- San Francisco Symphony
- Santa Rosa Symphony
- Sarasota Symphony
- Seattle Symphony
- Spokane Symphony
- Symphony Silicon Valley
- Syracuse Symphony
- Toledo Symphony
- Tucson Symphony
- Utah Symphony
- Virginia Symphony
- West Virginia Symphony
- Wichita Symphony
- Wisconsin Chamber Orchestra
CANADIAN ORCHESTRAS
- Calgary Philharmonic
- Edmonton Symphony
- Kitchener-Waterloo Symphony
- National Arts Centre Orchestra
- Orchestra London Canada
- Orchestre Metropolitain
- Orchestre Symphonique de Montreal
- Symphony Nova Scotia
- Thunder Bay Symphony
- Toronto Symphony
- Vancouver Symphony
- Victoria Symphony
- Windsor Symphony
- Winnipeg Symphony
A (Small) Failure To Communicate
Returning to the 2009 reviews are the orchestra surveys which are designed to be completed by representatives from each respective review orchestra and provide everyone with details about each orchestra’s website that go beyond the items included in the review. Perhaps the most important element of the surveys is providing an opportunity for each organization to include any additional information they feel is relevant to their current website condition and this is where each group can take advantage of an opportunity to do just that.
Each US and Canadian orchestra in the review was sent a special email with a link to the online survey, instructions, and a list of survey questions. Unfortunately, a few email addresses kept bouncing back as undeliverable and after attempting to verify marketing director contact information, I discovered that the following organizations provided no email contact information (not even a contact form). I encourage anyone from these orchestras to contact me directly to obtain the survey link and information.
- Dallas Symphony Orchestra
- Kansas City Symphony
- Long Beach Symphony Orchestra
- Minnesota Orchestra
- The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra
- Winnipeg Symphony Orchestra
Finally, if you are a marketing director at any of the orchestras included in the 2009 review and did not receive yesterday’s survey email notice (spam filters can be overzealous sometimes), let me know and I’ll forward along the information. The deadline to complete the survey is Wednesday, 9/30/2009, so don’t wait!
Excellent initiative, Drew! Will there be a cut-off date for reviewing? If there’s not, will there be an option to change your review if the organization changes their Web site?
Hopefully there will be a good number of people writing reviews. It’s important for the organizations to know what people/patrons think of their Web site. Let’s see if they’re going to pay attention to what’s being said!
Thanks for the kind words Marc, although I haven’t determined the date, there will be a cut-off point. The problem of orchestras updating or implementing major renovations to their website is always an issue, which is why I’m encouraging readers to make sure they leave some sort of date reference in comment based reviews so the respective orchestra managers will have a useful frame of reference. Worst case scenario is managers can always assume with a certain degree of confidence that the date a comment review was posted was on or near the date the reader visited their website.
Shutting down the reader ratings/reviews also provides a fair and fresh look at each year’s websites and I do hope readers will take advantage of the new opportunity and that orchestras will be able to use this as a vehicle for reaching out to audience members (especially if they are proud of their website).