Following an initial press blackout, the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra (ISO) launched a PR campaign related to the ongoing labor dispute with their musicians. They released a lengthy press statement on 9/3/2012 that provides rationale for some of the austerity measures being pursued in the new collective bargaining agreement.
According to quotes in the statement from ISO board chairman, John Thornburgh, it appears that the ISO board sees itself in the same light as Detroit and Philadelphia and that the way forward is to pattern the orchestra’s strategic vision after solutions pioneered by those ensembles.
“Hard as it is to contemplate, the model that Indianapolis, Philadelphia, Detroit and other orchestras have used for decades simply needs to be revisited, with the goal always being to retain and attract the highest quality possible with the resources available.”
On the same day the ISO released that statement, the musicians of the National Symphony Orchestra held a ratification meeting for terms related to a new four year master agreement that continues the organization’s trend of improvements to traditional compensation and work rules (details).
Similarly, on 8/31/2012 the Seattle Symphony announced that the organization met its fundraising goal for the 2011/12 season (details) and there are a number of other orchestras in recent years that have met annual fund goals, endowment recapitalization campaigns, and settled on labor agreements that provide null growth as well as improvements to compensation (Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston, Nashville, Oregon, etc.)
In the end, given the breadth of available examples, from institutional calamity to growth-centric sustainable success, perhaps the best type of comparative assessment for gaining perspective is to forego the process entirely in favor of one that focuses internally. After all, reaching for convenient peer comparisons in today’s orchestra field is an approach that works equally well for the goose as it does for the gander.
It’s always a good sign when a Board uses failure as a business model.
That’s an interesting observation and I genuinely wonder what sort of association the ISO board perceives by way of the comparison. Do they see those groups as the optimum examples for future business models or is there something else (or a little from Column A and a little from Column B)?
I’ve been reading these articles on adaptistration for a couple months now. Thanks for letting readers know what is going on with the struggling orchestras. However, could someone potentially write an article explaining why and how certain orchestras are actually doing very well right now. We know THAT the National Symphony Orchestra and the Seattle Symphony are doing well, but what have they done to be doing so well when so many other orchestras are on the verge of collapse?
I can’t speak for anyone else but me, and to that end we do cover a good bit of success stories here each year. Nashville Symphony is one group in particular that has produced a wealth of useful analysis and one of the more recent examples is Dayton Philharmonic.
It could be that they draw a parallel between Indianapolis (the city) and Detroit/Phila (the cities). Economically, the Indianapolis region has more in common with them than with your growth examples. And regional economics will obviously impact revenue for any symphony orchestra in this country.
Good observations Aaron, it will be interesting to see if they ever expand on this issue in future communication.
” . . .it appears that the ISO board sees itself in the same light as Detroit and Philadelphia and that the way forward is to pattern the orchestra’s strategic vision after solutions pioneered by those ensembles.”
. . . except, to my knowledge, neither The Philadelphia Orchestra nor The Detroit Symphony have become a part-time ensemble of 63 players with a 38 week schedule, which is what is being proposed in Indianapolis, and which would tragically dilute the artistic and musical quality of the exceptional and extraordinary Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra.