Nothing Like User Feedback To Help Make Things Better

Today’s post begins with analytics. I was examining the user flow for organization’s posting job listings at to see if any of the changes rolled out over the last few months had any unexpected negative impact. The good news is the answer was no; at the same time, I did discover one step in the submission process that took users much longer to complete than everything else.

As it turns out, it’s the one thing employers like to use but it was also the one thing giving them the most grief: uploading their logo.

I’ve known for a while that while actually uploading logos wasn’t difficult, users would get confused over why a logo wouldn’t show up in social shares (usually because it was too small) or the only versions they had on hand were print quality with too large of file sizes.

So, I ran a little A/B experiment where one version of the form had the logo upload field removed. Perhaps unsurprisingly, that version had lower average times to submit.

While analytics are a critical part of an answer, they aren’t the only part. The other piece of this puzzle was user feedback.

I was fortunate in that some of the employers that went through the no-logo version were regular users who always upload a logo with their listings. I reached out to them to ask if they found the lack of a logo impacted applications coming in from the site. The answer was no (a good thing).

I also asked them what they thought about their listings in general and if the lack of a logo detracted from them. Once again, the answers were all no.

Consequently, I removed the logo from all submissions for two weeks and am happy to report it had no measurable negative impact. For now, the site is going logo free.

The only remaining piece was the need for a social share image. While I already had a placeholder image, it’s three years old and that was reason enough for an update:

About Drew McManus

"I hear that every time you show up to work with an orchestra, people get fired." Those were the first words out of an executive's mouth after her board chair introduced us. That executive is now a dear colleague and friend but the day that consulting contract began with her orchestra, she was convinced I was a hatchet-man brought in by the board to clean house.

I understand where the trepidation comes from as a great deal of my consulting and technology provider work for arts organizations involves due diligence, separating fact from fiction, interpreting spin, as well as performance review and oversight. So yes, sometimes that work results in one or two individuals "aggressively embracing career change" but far more often than not, it reinforces and clarifies exactly what works and why.

In short, it doesn't matter if you know where all the bodies are buried if you can't keep your own clients out of the ground, and I'm fortunate enough to say that for more than 15 years, I've done exactly that for groups of all budget size from Qatar to Kathmandu.

For fun, I write a daily blog about the orchestra business, provide a platform for arts insiders to speak their mind, keep track of what people in this business get paid, help write a satirical cartoon about orchestra life, hack the arts, and love a good coffee drink.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment